Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science
Book Description
What if the very foundations of knowledge were crumbling under the weight of pretentious jargon? In "Fashionable Nonsense," Alan Sokal exposes the dangerous intersection of postmodern thought and science, revealing how certain intellectuals have twisted scientific principles to serve their agendas. With razor-sharp wit and unyielding clarity, Sokal dismantles the facade of confusion cloaking these theories, unraveling the threads that connect language, meaning, and truth. This provocative exploration challenges the arrogance of intellectualism and questions the integrity of academia. Are we witnessing a grave betrayal of science, or is it merely fashionable nonsense?
Quick Book Summary
"Fashionable Nonsense" by Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont is a sharp critique of how certain postmodern philosophers and intellectuals have misused concepts and terminology from the natural sciences. Sokal, known for the famous Sokal Hoax, extends his critique into book form, examining texts by authors such as Lacan, Kristeva, Irigaray, Latour, and Baudrillard. The authors argue that these influential figures have employed scientific language either incorrectly or in a deliberately obscure manner, leading to confusion rather than enlightenment. Sokal and Bricmont contend that this abuse undermines both scientific integrity and academic honesty. Their work advocates for clear boundaries between disciplines and emphasizes the necessity for precise language and rigor, especially when invoking the authority of science. The book is both a defense of rational inquiry and an expose of intellectual pretension.
Summary of Key Ideas
Table of Contents
Misuse of Scientific Language in Humanities
At the heart of "Fashionable Nonsense" is the claim that some leading postmodern intellectuals have invoked scientific terminology far beyond their actual relevance or understanding. Sokal and Bricmont analyze direct excerpts from works by Jacques Lacan, Julia Kristeva, Luce Irigaray, Bruno Latour, and Jean Baudrillard, among others, pointing out fundamental errors and incoherence in their references to mathematics, physics, and biology. Instead of enlightening readers, such passages often introduce confusion, inadequately justifying their use of complex scientific terms to support philosophical or sociological arguments.
Consequences for Academic Integrity and Public Understanding
Beyond individual cases of mishandling scientific language, the book explores how these practices impact academia as a whole. Sokal and Bricmont warn that the unchecked spread of such jargon in non-scientific fields diminishes intellectual standards and promotes a culture where authority is based on complexity rather than correctness. This tendency, they argue, threatens public trust in both the sciences and the humanities, as well as making serious interdisciplinary dialogue more difficult.
Nature and Dangers of Relativism
Another central theme is the critique of epistemic and cultural relativism, which the authors see as rampant in strands of postmodern thought. Sokal and Bricmont argue that the claim "truth is socially constructed" is often wielded in ways that undermine scientific objectivity and reasoned debate. While recognizing the value of examining science’s cultural contexts, they reject extreme relativism that puts scientific findings and social beliefs on the same epistemic footing, warning of the social dangers such attitudes could entail.
Defense of Clear Thought and Rationality
In response, "Fashionable Nonsense" calls for a renewed respect for clarity, rigor, and critical engagement across disciplinary boundaries. Sokal and Bricmont insist on intellectual honesty and the need for precise definitions, especially when borrowing from other fields. Rather than retreating into insular specialization, they want open, reasoned conversation that does not lose sight of foundational standards of evidence and logical coherence.
The Sokal Hoax and Its Implications
The background of the so-called Sokal Hoax—where Sokal published a deliberately nonsensical article in a cultural studies journal—frames the book’s argument. The incident is used to illustrate the risks of uncritical acceptance of fashionable jargon and the dangers of intellectual environments that privilege style over substance. "Fashionable Nonsense," therefore, stands both as a warning and as a passionate defense of science, logic, and meaningful interdisciplinary exchange.
Download This Summary
Get a free PDF of this summary instantly — no email required.