Back to Wheel of Books
Cover of Dereliction of Duty: Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam

Dereliction of Duty: Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam

by H.R. McMaster

Nonfiction HistoryPoliticsMilitary FictionWarMilitary HistoryAmerican History

Book Description

A war was fought not just on distant fields, but in the twisted corridors of power where deception reigned supreme. Lyndon Johnson and Robert McNamara orchestrated a narrative that misled a nation, while the Joint Chiefs of Staff grappled with their own complicity. As bombers roared and soldiers fell, the stakes rose higher and higher, leading America into a conflict shrouded in lies and unintended consequences. Behind every decision lurked the shadows of ambition and fear. What if the true battle was for the moral soul of a nation, rather than the jungles of Vietnam?

Quick Summary

"Dereliction of Duty" by H.R. McMaster is a seminal analysis of the political and military decision-making that led the United States into the Vietnam War. Through extensive research, McMaster reveals how President Lyndon Johnson, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, and their civilian advisors crafted a misleading narrative for the public, downplaying the scope and risks of US involvement in Vietnam. The Joint Chiefs of Staff, the top military advisors, failed to assert their professional judgment and allowed themselves to be marginalized in crucial deliberations. McMaster argues that personal ambition, fear of political repercussions, and institutional failures all contributed to a legacy of deception and mismanagement. The result was a prolonged conflict entered under false pretenses, with disastrous consequences for both the US military and the nation's trust in its leaders.

Summary of Key Ideas

Civil-Military Relations and Broken Trust

McMaster begins by examining the breakdown in civil-military relations during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. The traditional structure in which military advisors provided objective strategies and assessments for civilian leaders eroded as the Joint Chiefs of Staff became sidelined. Political concerns and the desire to minimize domestic backlash led leaders to seek military advice that confirmed their preexisting hopes rather than challenge them with reality.

Deception and Political Calculations

Deception and the manipulation of information were central tools for Johnson and McNamara. The administration misrepresented the scale and intent of US involvement in Vietnam, both to Congress and the public. Key decisions, such as the incremental deployment of troops and the false justification of the Gulf of Tonkin incidents, were orchestrated to maintain political popularity rather than pursue a coherent military strategy.

Marginalization of the Joint Chiefs

The Joint Chiefs of Staff, nominally the nation’s senior military authorities, failed to assert their expertise effectively. Internal divisions, submission to civilian authority, and fear of repercussions led them to acquiesce to flawed decisions. McMaster argues that their collective silence and compliance constituted a profound dereliction of duty, undercutting their professional responsibilities and enabling catastrophic policy.

Consequences of Failed Leadership

Consequences swiftly followed, as the flawed strategy and lack of honest debate led the United States into a prolonged and unwinnable conflict. American soldiers and Vietnamese civilians paid the highest price, and the US military’s morale and credibility suffered immensely. These failures also eroded public trust in government and military institutions for generations to come.

The Legacy of the Vietnam Decision

Ultimately, McMaster highlights that the true battle was not in Vietnam’s jungles but within Washington’s corridors of power. The failure to foster open dialogue, prioritize truth, and confront uncomfortable realities set a precedent for future crises. The book stands as a warning about the dangers of political calculation overriding ethical and professional obligations in matters of war and national security.